They couldn’t even win
Comment on Phonecall campaign to tell MasterCard & Visa to stop censoring adult content
reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days agoBecause of a risk of suing. There is no such risk when removing content, but adding content can lead to that risk…
RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 2 days ago
reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
My dude I am not your enemy I am just stating a fact. Downvoting me is brain dead.
RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I hadn’t yet (I might now tho) because I understand what you’re trying to say even if that argument is actually nonsense. It’s not even like evangelicals could use a different payment system to replace these companies after they lose from running out of money or getting ignored completely because they can’t actually sue these companies. Especially not for this.
This is clearly another attempt to control steam because other methods failed. 1000 anything couldn’t get visa/PayPal etc. to do something unless they were already in on it. The only reason flooding them 10-100x in calls and emails won’t work is this apart of their grand master plan to get murdered by horny neckbeards. Seems right up Thiel’s alley
reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
I’m not saying it from the perspective of collective shout, not even that they would be the ones suing.
I’m saying if a payment processor allows in illegal content, they are in the wrong legally.
While if they rescind some legal content’s availability because of potential risks, they’re not wrong legally speaking.
That’s what my comment was about, in replying to the one above it.
pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 day ago
who would sue who? who is being harmed? the crazies sure can’t: what harm have they suffered by mastercard facilitating transactions between 2 unrelated parties?
reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
Read my other recent comment.