Comment

gofsckyourself@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

The real context is that I was merely disagreeing with db0 being chill based on my own experience. Flatworm/Unruffled and Eugene then busted in being rude as hell for just disagreeing. You supported that behavior.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
The first link refers to that exchange indeed. Everyone can interpret that conversation on their own.

source
- gofsckyourself@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  What other interpretation could there even be?
  
  My comment made no claims regarding the user from the main post or actions against them, it was only in regard to the claim about db0.
  
  I was not rude at all, just that I disagreed. Why does that mean it’s okay for those two to jump in to rudely make false claims?
  
  source
  - Blaze@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Other interpretation: you and db0 admins have had disagreements in the past:
    
    sopuli.xyz/post/26484371/16400011?sort=Top
    
    lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/43426671/18476015
    
    Those disagreements are what alter your perception of the instance, which is why they mention them.
    
    source
    gofsckyourself@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    The interpretation of those two jumping in to be rude as hell is not exclusive from acknowledging disagreements in the past. Particularly in that is already implied with my original comment there as I referenced my experience.
    
    There was absolutely no reason for those two to act that way there, even if their intention was to attempt to point out that they think I was in the wrong in the previous encounters. “I think you were the one in the wrong at those times you’re referring to.” Or something along those lines accomplishes the same goal without being an asshole or making clearly false claims.
    
    Ironically, their choice to be such assholes in that circumstance adds quite a bit of evidence that the dbzer0 people were the ones in the wrong.
    
    source