No, the opposite. They are superior. Bifacial panels have a 3% additional yield over standard panels. The +10-20% cost premium is covered by the +30% revenue
Even with traditional mountings, Bifacial panels pick up extra light reflected from the ground.
Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 days ago
My interpretation of your comment was that bifacial solar panels are a useless gimmick which allows companies to charge more for a cheaper product.
Is that correct?
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No, the opposite. They are superior. Bifacial panels have a 3% additional yield over standard panels. The +10-20% cost premium is covered by the +30% revenue
Even with traditional mountings, Bifacial panels pick up extra light reflected from the ground.
Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Bad read on my part, sorry for the snark. Carry on.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No problem. Take a closer look a the link, particularly the graphs.