You can even compile Fortran code to wasm and run it on a web browser. Who need Javascript’s puny 64bit floating point precision when you can have Fortran’s superior 128bit floating point precision?
Comment on Which side are you? Javascript or Typescript
Knusper@feddit.de 1 year ago
I’m choosing the third side: WebAssembly
redcalcium@lemmy.institute 1 year ago
Static_Rocket@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Have they finally dumped the required js stub loader?
Knusper@feddit.de 1 year ago
No, but GUI frameworks can generate it for you. Same goes for DOM access, for which there’s normally only a JavaScript API.
So, you’ll likely want to read JS, when researching what events or properties you can read/write for certain HTML nodes in the DOM, but with a mature GUI framework, you should not need to write any JS.
QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 1 year ago
Blazingly fast 🦀🦀🦀
marcos@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Incredibly powerful type system λλλ
QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 1 year ago
Really? Why is that?
marcos@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The wasm ABI allows for a bit more flexibility than the C one.
I’m not sure how much impact it has on practice (probably very little, otherwise somebody would have fixed it), but in native code there’s a lot of potential for mismatching behaviors from the two different runtimes.