Comment on Firefox is fine. The people running it are not
pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 week agoBut the common understanding is a bit different than yours.
the common understanding is that android is a different operating system to ubuntu, and macos is a different operating system to openbsd
Would Debian GNU/kFreeBSD be 50% Linux, 50% FreeBSD under your definition even though it has no Linux code?
it is what it is: a completely different thing… BSD system tools with a linux kernel
mholiv@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You’re gunna do you and I respect that. But the first line from the page is
It is literally GNU userland using the GNU C library on top of FreeBSD’s kernel, coupled with the regular Debian package set
You can say is BSD system tools with a Linux kernel but you would be evidently and clearly wrong.
Anyways. I wish you well. Best of luck.
pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 week ago
okay, sorry i got the kernel and system tools mixed up in my head after reading it. that proves nothing other than the fact that you’re looking for a gotcha rather than a serious discussion
mholiv@lemmy.world 1 week ago
That’s ok! I was just trying to help you see the difference. You do know. It’s a win/win. There was a reason why I kept on brining up Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. It really highlights the difference.
pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 week ago
and my point is that these things aren’t definitions that have particularly concrete categories… an operating system is not a single thing: it can be many different things which include things like GUIs even… as much as we try to fit the world into neat little boxes, that’s just not how things work
even the categories of operating systems is messy: take single user vs multi user… macos is single user, but openbsd is multi user… i’m the beginning, the kernel was largely the same but due to the system tools and configuration, macos became a different classification of operating system
it’s all super messy, and saying that windows vista and windows 11 are the same operating system is extremely reductive