Comment on PSA: If the first Smart Search in Immich takes a while
Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 6 days agoIs this something that would be recommended if self-hosting off a Synology 920+ NAS?
My NAS does have extra ram to spare because I upgraded it, and has NVME cache 🤗
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 days ago
That’s a Celeron right? I’d try a better AI model. Check [this page]immich.app/docs/features/searching/) for the list. You could try the heaviest one. It’ll take a long time to process your library but I don’t know how much faster the inference is. Maybe it would be fast enough. If not usable, choose a lighter model. There’s execution times in the table that I assume tell us how heavy the models are.
Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 6 days ago
Yup, the Intel J4125 Celeron 4-Core CPU, 2.0-2.7Ghz.
I switched to the ViT-SO400M-16-SigLIP2-384__webli model, same as what you use. I don’t worry about processing time, but it looks like a more capable model, and I really only use immich for contextual search anyway, so that might be a nice upgrade.
iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 6 days ago
What’s your consideration for choosing this one? I would have thought ViT-B-16-SigLIP2__webli to be slightly more accurate, with faster response and all that while keeping a slightly less RAM consumption.
Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 6 days ago
Seemed to be the most popular. LOL The smart search job hasn’t been running for long, so I’ll check that other one out and see how it compares. If it looks better, I can easily use that.
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 days ago
Did you run the Smart Search job?
Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 6 days ago
Running now.