Comment on AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon study
What’s 0.7^10?
About 0.02
So the chances of it being right ten times in a row are 2%.
No the chances of being wrong 10x in a row are 2%. So the chances of being at least right once are 98%.
Ah, my bad, you’re right, for being consistently correct, I should have done 0.3^10=0.0000059049
so the chances of it being right ten times in a row are less than one thousandth of a percent.
No wonder I couldn’t get it to summarise my list of data right and it was always lying by the 7th row.
don’t you dare understand the explicitly obvious reasons this technology can be useful and the essential differences between P and NP problems. why won’t you be angry >:(
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 days ago
About 0.02
davidagain@lemmy.world 2 days ago
So the chances of it being right ten times in a row are 2%.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No the chances of being wrong 10x in a row are 2%. So the chances of being at least right once are 98%.
davidagain@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Ah, my bad, you’re right, for being consistently correct, I should have done 0.3^10=0.0000059049
so the chances of it being right ten times in a row are less than one thousandth of a percent.
No wonder I couldn’t get it to summarise my list of data right and it was always lying by the 7th row.
jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
don’t you dare understand the explicitly obvious reasons this technology can be useful and the essential differences between P and NP problems. why won’t you be angry >:(