Comment on Why shouldn’t firearm manufacturers be held accountable for the use of their weapons in crimes?
phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 year agoIt’s been suggested that the gun lobby is actively hiding data on how bad their products are to health
ojp.gov/…/access-denied-how-gun-lobby-depriving-p…
While not a 1-to-1 comparison, I think it’s relevant to compare them to Tobacco.
AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I firmly disagree. I’m not a fan of guns (or tobacco), but these just aren’t analogous situations. The number of people who think a gun can’t be lethal when you point it at someone’s head is essentially zero, but for years they talked about the health benefits of smoking. And “the gun lobby” isn’t the same as “gun manufacturers” the way that the tobacco lobby was basically completely funded by tobacco companies.
Yes, there are a bunch of people who don’t want us to be able to study how many gun deaths there are a year, but it’s not because they don’t want us to know if guns pose a health risk or not. It’s just a different situation.
phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 year ago
In my opinion, the difference isn’t enough to invalidate the comparison. Same goes for the gun lobby being co-mingled with weapons manufacturers. Compare the NRA from the 70s to the NRA from the 90s and today. It went from a safety organization to an organization only caring about selling more weapons. I lived in a NRA household growing up, and their literature no matter who was President was constant fear mongering over not being able to have or buy more weapons, implying everyone should buy buy buy.
AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 1 year ago
And apparently a lot of NRA funding as part of that transition came from Russia, which is honestly part of my point. The gun lobby doesn’t seem to be primarily manufacturers, so holding them responsible for the horrific gun death rate in this country doesn’t make sense to me.