Most people could live without youtube period. But what the fuck would be the reason to do it?
You don’t know why it would be good to stop exploiting children for clicks and ad revenue? Do you think a 12 yo can consent to live streaming their life for the whole world to watch?
Even so, the much more ridiculous one to me is the second one.
Cell phone bans are now common in schools. More and more researcher shows phones are bad for development.
You don’t know why it would be good to stop exploiting children for clicks and ad revenue? Do you think a 12 yo can consent to live streaming their life for the whole world to watch?
The question is not whether you can find one kind of video/streaming that is exploitative but whether all of them are. Is it exploitative to share video from a spelling bee competition? Is it exploitative to share a school theater video? If not, ban the things that are.
As for whether to give phones to children, that is a parents decision. As for the research, it is the same as above. Clearly these issues did not exist with early smartphones. So it’s not the phones, it something on them. My money is on social media and the “idle” games. Parents have the option to prevent installation of those.
You don’t ban pipes, because they can be used to make pipe-bombs. You ban making pipe-bombes. Your proposals are so broad they would ban way too many things that are ok.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 weeks ago
I would be surprised if majority of people couldn’t live without watching kids on youtube but who knows, maybe you’re right.
DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Most people could live without youtube period. But what the fuck would be the reason?
Even so, the much more ridiculous one to me is the second one.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 weeks ago
You don’t know why it would be good to stop exploiting children for clicks and ad revenue? Do you think a 12 yo can consent to live streaming their life for the whole world to watch?
Cell phone bans are now common in schools. More and more researcher shows phones are bad for development.
newsweek.com/overcoming-our-denial-about-smartpho…
www.sciencedirect.com/…/S2451958821000622
But you want to give them to kids why exactly?
DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
The question is not whether you can find one kind of video/streaming that is exploitative but whether all of them are. Is it exploitative to share video from a spelling bee competition? Is it exploitative to share a school theater video? If not, ban the things that are.
As for whether to give phones to children, that is a parents decision. As for the research, it is the same as above. Clearly these issues did not exist with early smartphones. So it’s not the phones, it something on them. My money is on social media and the “idle” games. Parents have the option to prevent installation of those.
You don’t ban pipes, because they can be used to make pipe-bombs. You ban making pipe-bombes. Your proposals are so broad they would ban way too many things that are ok.