Comment on PSA: Update your Tailscale!
hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 3 days agoDoesn’t Tailscale do a lot more, like ACLs and tailnet lock and a web ui and everything? I thought Headscale was trying to provide the same, though I admit I’ve never tried it myself
lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 days ago
It does, there’s a lot of features and UI added on top of it because it’s primarily an enterprise-oriented service and large companies tend to have a lot more complex usage scenarios than self-hosters.
Headscale is a FOSS reimplementation from scratch of some of the Tailscale proprietary features. It’s inteded as a fallback option for Tailscale users in case the Tailscale service ever enshittifies, and also as a canary for ongoing verification of the Tailscale claim that the client plane functionality is entirely FOSS and above-board.
Speaking of which, Tailscale today is a great example of a company using FOSS well. They are able to provide commercial services and have proprietary code while at the same time opening the client-facing code so users can see for themselves their privacy is cryptographically proven. They also cooperate very well with Headscale and provide a generous gratis service tier.
hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
My issue with Headscale is that it seems like they are providing a very complex product and haven’t had any security audits (at least last I checked)…
Wireguard is nice because it is very simple, and thus has a much smaller attack surface.