Comment on [deleted]

• pennomi@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Not necessarily, but having access to cheap labor AND raw materials would ensure that.

  Now I’m not going to pretend that AI is anywhere close to being a source of cheap labor. It really can’t do much without a human to assist it.

  source

  • SufferingSteve@feddit.nu ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I admire your positivity. I do not share it though, because from what I have seen, because even if there are open weights, the one with the biggest datacenter will in the future hold the most intelligent and performance model.

    Very similar to how even if storage space is very cheap today, large companies are holding all the data anyway.

    AI will go the same way, and thus the megacorps will and in some extent already are owning not only our data, but our thoughts and the ability to modify them.

    I mean, sponsored prompt injection is just the first thought modifying thing, imagine Google search sponsored hits, but instead it’s a hyperconvincing AI response that subtly nudges you to a certain brand or way of thinking.

    Absolutely terrifies me, especially with all the research Meta has done on how to manipulate people’s mood and behaviour through which social media posts they are presented with

    source