Comment on Australian police beat an opposition politician so badly that she might lose an eye -- simply for being at an anti-genocide protest.

• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  To deny that is to deny your own ability to see, read and think.

  So you admit to not being able to do any of those three?

  source

  • CatherineLily@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I merely asked whether your source is Adrian Zenz and your immediate reaction is to insult and belittle. I’m sorry but I’m just a nobody with no interest on genocide, so I haven’t spent hours researching the subject. I guess that makes me a complete idiot who is unable to see, read or think.

    source

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      If you ask me about some specific source, then you already know that what i have said is true and you are just trying to argue for the sake of arguing. If you know the name Adrian Zenz, then you know how to read a Wikipedia article.

      source

      • CatherineLily@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Yeah, nah. I don’t care enough to argue with you. Just for the record, I don’t know what you said is true. I don’t believe there’s a genocide in Xinjiang. Sure, there’s definitely bad things going on there like systemic oppression but I doubt it’s at the level of genocide.

        source
• jeena@piefed.jeena.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  What do you mean by prove? This person just copy and pasted the definition.

  source

  • CatherineLily@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    And there is plenty of documented proof of that.

    They mentioned there’s plenty of documented proof, so I asked whether it’s from Adrian Zenz.

    source

    • knightly@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Why?

      source

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Because they are trying to catch people in a bad faith argument about the validity of specific individual sources.

        source