Comment on Judge Rules Training AI on Authors' Books Is Legal But Pirating Them Is Not

<- View Parent
gaja@lemm.ee ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

Yes. You learned not to touch a hot stove either from experience or a warning. That fear was immortalized by your understanding that it would hurt. An AI will to you not to touch a hot stove (most of the time) because the words “hot” “stove” “pain” etc… pop up in its dataset together millions of times. As things are, they’re barely comparable. The only reason people keep arguing is because the output is very convincing. Go and download pytorch and read some stuff, or Google it. I’ve even asked deepseek for you:

Can AI learn and understand like people?

AI can learn and perform many tasks similarly to humans, but its understanding is fundamentally different. Here’s how AI compares to human learning and understanding:

1. Learning: Similar in Some Ways, Different in Others

2. Understanding: AI vs. Human Cognition

3. Strengths & Weaknesses

AI Excels At:

AI Falls Short At:

4. Current AI (Like ChatGPT) is a "Stochastic Parrot"

5. Future Possibilities (AGI)

Conclusion:

AI can simulate learning and understanding impressively, but it doesn’t experience them like humans do. It’s a powerful tool, not a mind.

Would you like examples of where AI mimics vs. truly understands?

source
Sort:hotnewtop