Comment on Judge Rules Training AI on Authors' Books Is Legal But Pirating Them Is Not
vane@lemmy.world 10 hours agoYeah but it’s just a start to reverse the process and prove that there is no AI. We only started with generating text I bet people figure out how to reverse process by using some sort of Rosetta stone. It’s just probabilities after all.
nednobbins@lemmy.zip 10 hours ago
That’s possible but it’s not what the authors found.
They spend a fair amount of the conclusion emphasizing how exploratory and ambiguous their findings are. The researchers themselves are very careful to point out that this is not a smoking gun.
vane@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Yeah authors rely on the recent deep mind paper aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-long.469.pdf ( they even cite it ) that describes (n, p)-discoverable extraction. This is recent studies because right now there are no boundaries, basically people made something and now they study their creation. We’re probably years from something like gdpr for llm.