Comment

If people here were saying racist shit about Palestinians I’d be arguing with them. I don’t see that happen on this site, but I see there’s a bit of an antisemitism problem and that’s something someone needs to address. When people get into a bubble like this and are constantly doing stochastic terrorism talk, some fucked up things can happen if no one pipes in to make people consider they might be going off the rails a little bit.

So I’m taking a break from countering racism and stochastic terrorism on this site to poke some fun at some leftists in a shitpost thread.

Is this really the best forum to discuss genocide? If you’re looking at my comment history, maybe just reply to one of the comments where that’s already being discussed. Well if you can get in a reply before my comments get deleted, that is. Not sure if that happens in an attempt the censor other points of views or to sane-wash out the crazy replies I get when I merely offer the point of view that most people in the world hold about a subject. Either way, at least some people that see them are reminded that not everyone in the world believes the crazy things that get posted here. You obviously saw some of my comments before they got deleted, so that’s a win.

I’ve had multiple people thank me for doing this in my DMs, so there’s dozens of us! And it saddens me the intimidation tactics that get used to squelch discussion of certain subjects on this site.

So, anyway stochastic terrorism is bad, antisemitism is bad, and socialism has failed many times in history. Lets see if I get banned from the “shitpost” community for saying these outrageous things, LOL.

source

Sort:hotnew top

AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
I’m not gonna argue with you because you’re a lost loser, but for the rest of users reading this person’s comments: this is a genocide denier asking questions such as “why do you consider the Israel-Hamas conflict a genocide?”. This is what the defence of capitalism leads to.

source
- SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Unwilling to have discussion indicates you’re afraid you might be wrong about things and discussion may bring that to light.
  
  People who have thought through their positions aren’t afraid to discuss them. I could be wrong about some things, but if that’s the case then and a discussion brings that out, I can change my position, and then I hold stronger positions on issues.
  
  Propagandists that are just repeating slogans are afraid to discuss the topics they supposedly care about passionately. If discussions bring to light their slogans are wrong, then that decreases their standing within their movement which is just a tribal group. The goal of the propagandist isn’t to further a cause it’s only to show loyalty to the tribe and increase their standing.
  
  So go ahead and throw insults at me to prove your loyalty to the tribe. It only proves you’re incapable of growing your movement because you’re incapable of having a rational discussion. If you’re constantly promoting feelings of hatred to impress the political group you’re in, consider the possibility that you might be in a hate group.
  
  source
  - AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    
    Unwilling to have discussion indicates you’re afraid you might be wrong about things and discussion may bring that to light.
    
    No, it means there’s nothing to argue in good faith with zionazis. Heard of the Nazi bar problem?
    
    source
    SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Yes lemmy indeed has a bit of a Nazi bar problem, with all the antisemitism that gets posted here unchallenged.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments