Right and what I was saying was even if it wasnt “public”, single party consent means the person recording can be that single party- so still a non-issue.
Comment on What exactly is a self-hosted small LLM actually good for (<= 3B)
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 4 days agoThere is no expectation of privacy in public spaces. Participants to these streams which are open to all do not have a prohibition on repeating what they have heard.
carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 4 days ago
kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
Repeating what they heard is very different from automatically processing the chat to harvest personal information about the participants.
Just because some data is publicly available doesn’t mean all processing of that data is legal and moral.
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 days ago
It is qualitatively equivalent. Any single piece of information could have been copied, it is safe to assume it has all been copied.
Although I would be onboard for supporting an expectation of pruvacy in public spaces and making private cctv recording illegal.