I could arrange that somehow as being able to reply with memegens was part of the original idea. But you might still end up with a bad 1shot.
I could arrange that somehow as being able to reply with memegens was part of the original idea. But you might still end up with a bad 1shot.
RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 1 week ago
I actually think the bad one shot is kind of part of the joke.
For instance: Someone posts a petty revenge story about getting back at their ex boyfriend for cleaning out their bank account.
I comment on that post with my request to aihorde along the lines of “a drag queen lifting a champagne glass as a toast to how delightfully petty someone is being”.
AIHorde will then generate the image.
Regardless of how good or bad the gen is, my original intent will come across because the OP can still see that my AIHorde prompt was intended to compliment OP. The bonus is if AIHorde comes up with an awesome output, it will be hilarious. It the output is terrible, also hilarious. If the output is so-so, the original intent of a compliment was still delivered.
At least, that’s my thinking.
As an example: Slack kind of had this functionality when sending GIFs awhile back. If you had the Giphy integration, you’d just type “/gif {topic}” and the integration would select a random gif that was returned from searching your topic. This GIF would be posted in the chat without you having the chance to review it first. Sometimes the GIF returned was irrelevant result, but everyone brushed it off because they knew how random the integration could be. Other times, it returned the perfect GIF and the potential randomness of result made a good GIF result even more satisfying.