Comment on F.D.A. to Use A.I. in Drug Approvals to ‘Radically Increase Efficiency’
OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 3 days ago
So we’re going to depend on AI, which can’t reliably remember how many fingers humans have, to take over medical science roles. Neat!
3abas@lemm.ee 3 days ago
Different types of AI, different training data, different expectations and outcomes. Generative AI is but one use case.
It’s already been proven a useful tool in research, when directed and used correctly by an expert. It’s a tool, to give to scientists to assist them, not replace them.
If you’re goal to use AI to replace people, you’ve got a bad surprise coming.
If you’re not equipping your people with the skills and tools of AI, your people will become obsolete in short time.
Learn AI and how to utilize it as a tool, you can train your own model on your own private data and locally interrogate the model to do unique analysis typically not possible in realtime. Learn the goods and bads of technology and let your ethics guide how you use it, but stop dismissing revolutionary technology because the earlier generative models weren’t reinforced enough get fingers right.
cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 days ago
They’re also likely to fire the experts.
Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
They already have.
OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I’m not dismissing its use. It is a useful tool, but it cannot replace experts at this point, or maybe ever (and I’m gathering you agree on this).
If it ever does get to that point, we need to also remedy the massive social consequences of revoking those same experts’ ability to have sufficient income to have a reasonable living.
I was being a little silly for effect.