Comment on Self-hosting your own media considered harmful - I just received my second community guidelines violation for my video demonstrating the use of LibreELEC on a Raspberry Pi 5, for 4K video playback

• sorghum@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  If harmful isn’t defined in the ToS, then the Merriam Webster definition will likely be construed to mean to be harmful to YouTube’s business or to users. Although YouTube has been selective in this enforcement, ie not banning all videos pertaining to martial arts or fighting clips, drug use, or ad block tutorials.

  source

  • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    That just answers a question that no one is asking. This is not an issue of defining words, it’s an issue of what the words are referring to, exactly.

    source

    • sorghum@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Exactly, I haven’t read the ToS to see if it is defined or references anything in there. I usually default to the standard definition of a word unless explicitly stated otherwise. For example, Sony changed the definition of purchase to remove any notion of ownership when buying content on their streaming platform.

      source

      • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        What? LOL no, not “exactly”. Again the definition is not in question. The question is what the word is referring to.

        source

        • -> View More Comments