Comment on Greener Alternative To Lithium-ion Battery

• LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Don’t use chatgpt as a source, there is no reason to trust anything it says.

  It might be right, it might have just thrown together words that sound right, or maybe it’s completely made up.

  source

  • metaStatic@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    it just guesses the next probable word. literally everything it says is made up.

    source

    • thal3s@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      “ChatGPT, please provide your rubble to this statement about you: […]”

      Hey! That’s a common misconception. While I do predict the next word based on patterns in the data I was trained on, I’m not just making things up. I provide information and answers based on the vast amount of text I’ve been trained on. It’s more about recognizing patterns and providing coherent, relevant responses than just “guessing.” Cheers!

      source
    • TrenchcoatFullofBats@belfry.rip ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      You have just described how human brains work

      source

      • thbb@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Not really. We also have deductive capabilities (aka "system 2") that enable us to ensure some level of proof over our statements.

        source
      • sky@codesink.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        right, and they’re actually pretty bad at remembering facts, that’s why we have entire institutions dedicated to maintain accurate reference material!

        why do people throw all of this out the window for advice from a dumb program I’ll never understand

        source
    • 8ender@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Words are how we communicate knowledge so sometimes the most probable combinations of words end up being facts

      source
    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      while it’s technically true that it “just predicts the next word”, it’s a very misleading argument to make.

      Computers are also “just some basic logic gates” and yet we can do complex stuff with them.

      Complex behaviour can result from simple things.

      Not defending the bullshit that LLMs generate, just to point out that you have to be careful with your arguments

      source
• BombOmOm@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  What is the energy density of this? It sounds like a rebrand of a hydrogen fuel cell, which has some limited applications, but has been supplanted by lithium-ion due to hydrogen’s low energy density and the fuel cells/electrolysis combo having poor energy efficiency.

  source

  • bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    The new proton battery has an energy density of 245 watt hours per kilogram, nearly three times the energy density of the team’s 2018 prototype

    source

    • Pretzilla@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Irrelevant to this discussion, though.

      How does it compare to competing technologies?

      source

      • bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        You asked for the energy density, that’s why it’s relevant?

        For the rest of your questions, try Google?

        Image

        source