I genuinely don’t understand the point of candidate filters like this. Is it that corporate has drank the kool-aid, and think the job they are hiring for genuinely requires some 1-in-1000 skillset?
Every time, somebody says “yeah but they get thousands of applications a day, how could they possibly handle all that?!”
… Don’t. Just, filter them through some basic metrics, and then rank the ones that are left through a random number generator. Interview those candidates in order until you find a good fit.
The average job doesn’t benefit at all from hiring people who can specifically pass some bizarre reverse Turing test, and the average video interview should only cost you 15-30 minutes of (also underpaid) HR salary, which is certainly less than a contract with these AI vendors + the increased risk of discrimination lawsuits.
acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 days ago
this happened to me a few months ago. applied for a job, got an invite to an AI interview along with instructions. emailed them back and said i found it disrespectful of my time as a candidate. I’m here investing my free time to see if the position is a good fit for bpth of us, so the least you can do is send one of your paid HR people to speak with me in person.
doctortofu@reddthat.com 5 days ago
Amen to that - way too many people forget that interviews are a two way street. You interview me, sure, but at the same time I am also interviewing you to see if the company is a good fit for me. Job seekers are not (or should not be) a bunch of starving orphans begging rich for job owners for scraps. Having a job means providing a service and being compensated for it, not total servitude…