Comment on Plex now will SELL your personal data
endeavor@sopuli.xyz 4 days agoThey can’t delete everything they’ve collected and they propaply don’t.
In a few years the “do not agree” will dissapear anyway.
Comment on Plex now will SELL your personal data
endeavor@sopuli.xyz 4 days agoThey can’t delete everything they’ve collected and they propaply don’t.
In a few years the “do not agree” will dissapear anyway.
Fontasia@feddit.nl 3 days ago
…wikipedia.org/…/General_Data_Protection_Regulati…
endeavor@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
ohyeah im fully aware. Will they actually delete it or will they just mark it in database as deleted? Are big companies like google going to send their tech workers to go through all their tapes and databases archived all around the world and prove they actually deleted your data? Are there enough consequences to ensure companies actually scrub your data rather than do the bare minimum?
Fontasia@feddit.nl 2 days ago
First of all, the European Data Protection Board have shown they are more than willing to throw their weight around issue large fines and request audits. Second of all, have you actually looked at the types of data data brokers buy and sell? Massive records of IPs, and metrics.
Like above what “amazing treasure trove of personal data” are you giving up by clicking “I Accept”. Search queries of the Plex Free Movie\TV library, watch times of the same free library and whether you click on pre, mid or post roll ads. And who is going to buy and sell this? Ad providers who swear they are providing targeted advertising, but really have quotas and metrics to fill. They will end up showing irrelevant ads anyway, not because of some algorithm, but literally because the advertising industry does not give two shits about click through rates just that ads get shown.
There’s so much bitching in this thread like someone from AdSense or Outbrain has personally murdered a family member, but the truth is, these places are a grift. Annoying, yes, but mostly harmless. Oh and don’t try to pull “oh but governments can use this for surveillance” yes they could but as someone who has held a job a federal level tax office, they do not have the budget for profiling people like this and a corrupt government has cheaper and better options.
I will try my best to respect your opinion and what you think a “right to privacy” means but I have great trouble understanding the paranoia