Comment on Spread of sexual deepfake images created by generative AI growing in Japan
jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 week agoOr how about just adults.
Comment on Spread of sexual deepfake images created by generative AI growing in Japan
jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 week agoOr how about just adults.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Adult Adults or Pubescent Adults? Because that sounds like you want a lower bar to clear? Japan is one of many nations following Romeo and Juliet laws which protect minors age 14 to 18 and pre-existing relationships from persecution by the law, but personally I think production of all sub-18 pornographic imagery should be banned and all gratuitous imagery should be heavily restricted.
jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 week ago
Adults. Where I am from the word adult only has one meaning. An adult is a person of 18 years of age at the very least.
You said “mature looking” for which a 16 year old person might qualify depending on the exact interpretation which is not ok. It doesn’t matter what they look like, it matters whether they are an adult or not. Going for looks reminds me of creeps going “he/she is so mature for his/her age”. That is not ok.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 week ago
We’re talking about fictional women and artwork, their physical age is measured in seconds. In my language Woman means to say Adult Female, as opposed to Girl.
jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 week ago
Oh right. My mistake. I guess when it comes to art then anything that isn’t obviously a child is technically legal, if distasteful and morally more than questionable. At least that is the legal situation in most countries.
My objective is the minimisation of harm. If someone uses artwork and that means that they will never touch an underage person then that is a good thing even though I may not like it.