Comment

Comment on AI is rotting your brain and making you stupid

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

we only need it because Google Search has been rotted out

Not entirely. AI can do a great job pulling data from multiple sources and condensing into an answer. So even if search was still good, instead of hitting several sites and putting together a solution, I can hit one.

reinvent the wheel

That depends on how you use it. I use it to find relevant, existing libraries and provide me w/ examples on how to use it. If anything, it gets me to reinvent the wheel less.

It can certainly be used naively to get exactly what you’re talking about, and that’s what’s going to happen w/ inexperienced users, such as college students. My point is that, like power tools, it can be a great tool in an experience hand, and it can completely ruin the user if they’re inexperienced.

source

Sort:hotnew top

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

AI can do a great job pulling data from multiple sources and condensing into an answer.

Google could already do that. The format of the answer came in the blurb under the link, pertinent to the search.

I use it to find relevant, existing libraries and provide me w/ examples on how to use it.

AI Code Tools Widely Hallucinate Packages

The tendency of code-generating large language models (LLMs) to produce completely fictitious package names in response to certain prompts is significantly more widespread than commonly recognized, a new study has shown.

source
- sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  The format of the answer came in the blurb under the link
  
  Sure, and that works really well if I just need a quick fact check. I use DDG and use that feature a ton.
  
  But that doesn’t work when more context is needed, like in a comparison. I find myself clicking through and skimming a dozen pages, and with an LLM I end up only needing 3-4 pages after reading its summary to confirm what it said.
  
  AI Code Tools Widely Hallucinate Packages
  
  Sure, which is why I always verify things like that. I ask it to compare popular libraries that accomplish a task, then look for evidence that my preferred option does what I want (issues on the project page) and is actively maintained (recent commits, multiple active contributors, etc). The LLM is just there to narrow the search space and give me things to look for.
  
  To do that with regular search would take a bit longer since I’d need to compare each library to each other to find relevant blogs and whatnot. So even if search worked better, it would still take longer.
  
  Sometimes it breaks down and I go back to my old method, but it’s usually worth a shot.
  
  source