Comment on Former Meta exec says asking for artist permission will kill AI industry

Flickerby@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• toastmeister@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Copying isn’t theft, the original still exists. Just like watching pirated movies.

  source

  • Flickerby@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    If someone pirates a movie for home use its no big deal because yes. If someone pirates a movie and then opens a movie theatre and starts charging people to watch the movie that’s an entirely different matter. AI is a business generating income, not a person skipping out on a $4 rental fee.

    source
  • umbraroze@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    The AI industry doesn’t want to abolish or reform copyright law, they just want an exception so that they can keep appropriating shit. On the contrary, they’re pretty mad that AI stuff isn’t covered by more copyright.

    AI bros are not on the side of open culture.

    source

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I’m going to start an AI company then I can legally pirate anything I want.

      I wonder how these companies will gatekeep their special AI status.

      source

      • msage@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        With hundreds of millions of dollars.

        source
      • toastmeister@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Well that was the irony I was attempting to point out. People took it quite literally tho.

        source
  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Copying isn’t theft, the original still exists. Just like watching pirated movies.

    Shit take when the results are used for profit. Most of us that pirate aren’t legally monetizing our stash.

    source
  • Don_alForno@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    As long as people get punished for pirating media, corporations need to license their shit just as well.

    source
  • Blackmist@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Cool, so I can torrent without a VPN now?

    Oh, only the super rich can benefit. How convenient.

    source