Comment on Does anyone here have experience with Glauca.digital registrar?

user224@lemmy.sdf.org@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

• libewa@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Safari cannot open this page, because the server could not be found.

  original

  • user224@lemmy.sdf.org@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    OK, now I am even more interested. dig doesn’t return an A record:

    $ dig glauca.digital a
    
    ; <<>> DiG 9.20.27 <<>> glauca.digital a
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 11516
    ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
    
    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;glauca.digital.                        IN      A
    
    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
    glauca.digital.         3600    IN      SOA     ns1.as207960.net. 2bd17d47fafc43aa9be298a1cdfbd0ee.dns.glauca.digital. 1791925047 86400 3600 86400 3600
    

    Somehow, it does work in a browser. I tried different DNS servers as well (including NextDNS which I use in a browser), none returns an A record (or AAAA). So, naturally, I am curios what IP the browser uses. Since it clearly works, I tried ping just so that I could see the resulting IP, and figure out where it’s coming from.

    $ ping glauca.digital
    ping: glauca.digital: No address associated with hostname
    

    Great. That makes absolutely no sense at all. Where is Firefox getting the information from?
    So I went to about:networking DNS tab. The address field is empty. I am just typing this as I test. It’s just cache in my browser.

    I guess that would answer on reliability question. At least their nameservers still resolve to IP.

    original

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

      ddg still has results for their site, maybe they just took it down recently

      original