As a noggie, this resonates with me. My ideology is in line with nobody being more important from the Birthe lottery than anyone else. But my pragmatic side says that there are no pressing concerns that justify such a drastic change as abolishing the royal family.
They don’t cost that much, our regent is alright, and his heir apparent is pretty alright too. Might as well keep them around as a unifying symbol and as primary diplomats.
Plus, I have to admit that I like the concept of a lhaving an apolitical person with veto powers, in case some shithead starts something silly. I just hope said veto powers are used if needed.
Source: Met them both when I was in the army roughly 1.3 lifet8mes ago.
Z3k3@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I love that you said Canada but not the UK as we share a monarch 🤣 please send help i hate it here
frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
Heh. Yeah, I can’t really hold up a country backsliding on trans rights as an example of an effective constitutional monarchy.
Z3k3@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yeh that and the whole Enoch powel impression our aledged left wing prime minister is doing just now
throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Some people call it “TERF Island”