Comment on Volvo EX90’s Lidar Sensor Will Fry Your Phone’s Camera
Drigo@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
The company specifically called out “close-ups” as the problem, meaning that our phones should be safe with distant shots
Also I think they’re using lidar with a frequency of 1550 nanometer which can’t penetrate the eye or cause damage.
scintilla@lemm.ee 1 day ago
If you could find a source for that it would be comforting lmao.
Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
An additional factor with these systems is that light around the 1550 nm wavelength band (common for optical amplifiers) is regarded as relatively low risk, since the eye fluids absorb the light before it is focused on the retina. This tends to reduce the overall risk factor of such systems.
And remember
So to heat your eye of 1cm3 in 1 second you need 4.2 watts of infrared to enter your eye. That sounds too much power for lidar, but couldn’t find quickly how much power is emitted by lidar though…
Drigo@sopuli.xyz 23 hours ago
If you go to luminartech own website, on the home page, if you scroll abit down, they have a LiDAR 1550nm vs 905nm section and a downloadable 7 page pdf where you can read about it. It’s of course biased because they themselves are making it, so bear that in mind.