Absurd obscenities you spew my friend, the fact that an artist take influences from any kind of art form doesn’t mean the end result is not original and it is not intellectual property as that
hissingssid@lemy.lol 1 day ago
AI really shows the absurdity of intellectual property as a concept, the very way we learn, every idea we can have, every mental image we can create is the sum of copying and adapting the things we perceive. IP is ontological incoherent for this reason you cannot “own” an idea so much as you can own the water of one part of a stream
DimFisher@lemmy.world 1 day ago
godownloadacar@lemmy.cafe 1 day ago
Intellectual property is intellectual theft
arararagi@ani.social 1 day ago
I don’t disagree with you, but AI companies shouldn’t get an exclusive free pass.
hissingssid@lemy.lol 1 day ago
Oh yes, I am not saying that at all. I am still very unsure on my views of AI from a precautionary standpoint and I think that its commercial use will lead to more harm than good but if these things are the closest analogs we have to looking at how humans learn and create it shows IP is ridiculous- I mean we do not even need them to see this, if an idea was purely and solely one person’s property the idea of someone from the sentinel island inventing the cure for brain cancer is as likely as a team of oncologists at Oxford doing it.