Comment on Palworld had to remove game features because of Nintendo lawsuit

Pika@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• pishadoot@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  “Allowing bullying”

  You walk up to kids that got their face punched in on a playground and tell them to quit being a little bitch, too?

  source

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I don’t think I understand your argument here.

    I think a better comparison would be am I going to feel bad for the kid who got punched in the face with padding on, then decided that getting punched in the face was OK so they removed the padding. And the answer is firmly no

    source

    • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      You’re a fool.

      source
• Zahille7@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  So you gave a negative review to a game that’s more or less forced to make changes because of a different shitty company?

  source

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I put a negative review for a company making their game worse, because that’s what they did.

    The fact that they did it without a court decision saying “yes defo in the wrong here” didn’t help the decision making process.

    I am firm in my decision, a game as big as palworld was, just bending over backwards to a patent bully like Nintendo doesn’t deserve a good review, and nothing is going to change that.

    source