It was after the verdict of the trial. This was displayed during the sentencing hearing where family members get to state how the death affected them. It’s still fucked up, but to be clear it wasn’t used during the trial.
Comment on A Judge Accepted AI Video Testimony From a Dead Man
anachrohack@lemmy.world 10 months ago
AI should absolutely never be allowed in court. Defense is probably stoked about this because it’s obviously a mistrial. Judge should be reprimanded for allowing that shit
EveningPancakes@lemm.ee 10 months ago
BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Sentencing is still part of the carriage of justice. Fake statements like this should not be allowed until after all verdicts and punishments are decided.
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 10 months ago
You didn’t read the article.
This isn’t grounds for a mistrial, the trial was already over. This happened during the sentencing phase. The defense didn’t object to the statements.
From the article:
anachrohack@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It happened BEFORE sentencing
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 10 months ago
In the US criminal justice system, Sentencing happens after the Trial. A mistrial requires rules to be violated during the trial.
Also, there were at least 3 people in that room that both have a Juris Doctor and know the Arizona Court Rules, one of them is representing the defendant. Not a single one of them had any objections about allowing this statement to be made.
anachrohack@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Every single one of those people should have their licenses suspended. AI, which is inherently a misrepresentation of truth, belongs nowhere near a courtroom