Violence for the sake of violence is not the same as violence to stop violence. Everyone knows killing an abusive parent is morally grey whereas killing an innocent child is absolutely wrong.
I recently got a comment removed on the Fed because a mod misunderstood my comment. They thought that someone who maliciously harms the innocent is themselves innocent, therefore invalidating my ideal. My bet is they didn’t know what malice means, or they genuinely think that hurting people with no provocation doesn’t make you a bad person.
hazypenguin@feddit.nl 1 year ago
I got banned from reddit for a few days once because I posted something similar. Was told I was threatening violence. Lol
Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Violence for the sake of violence is not the same as violence to stop violence. Everyone knows killing an abusive parent is morally grey whereas killing an innocent child is absolutely wrong.
I recently got a comment removed on the Fed because a mod misunderstood my comment. They thought that someone who maliciously harms the innocent is themselves innocent, therefore invalidating my ideal. My bet is they didn’t know what malice means, or they genuinely think that hurting people with no provocation doesn’t make you a bad person.
toastmeister@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Like a war on terrorism, that then fights domestic terrorists, that then protects Tesla; any new powers will inevitably be abused.