You think it’s anti science to want complete disclosure when you as a person are being experimented on?
What kind of backwards thinking is that?
You think it’s anti science to want complete disclosure when you as a person are being experimented on?
What kind of backwards thinking is that?
SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Not when disclosure ruins the experiment. Nobody was harmed or even could be harmed unless they are dead stupid, in which case the harm is already inevitable.
thedruid@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You do realize the ends do not justify the means?
You do realize that MANY people on social media have emotional and mental situations occuring and that these experiments can have ramifications that cannot be traced?
This is just a small reason why this is so damn unethical
SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 1 week ago
In that case, any interaction would be unethical. How do you know that I don’t have an intense fear of the words “justify the means”? You could have just doomed me to a downward spiral ending in my demise. As if I didn’t have enough trouble. Yo not only made me see it, you tricked me into typing it.
thedruid@lemmy.world 1 week ago
you are being beyond silly.
in no way is what you just posited true . unsuspecting nd non malicious social faux pas are in no way equal to Intentionally secretive manipulation used to garner data from unsuspecting people
that was an embarrassingly bad attempt to defend an indefensible position, and one no-one would blame you for deleting and re-trying