Comment on Judge in Epic v. Apple bans Apple from charging commission on purchases made outside App Store
Jhex@lemmy.world 4 days agoNo what I am asking you is what evidence of enforcement do you see anywhere here?
Apple was ordered by the courts to do something, they blatantly ignored it and doubled down. At no point it seems the courts were enforcing their initial ruling. It took the defendants to bring this back to court again. What’s stopping Apple from not doing anything and ignoring the courts again?
Ulrich@feddit.org 4 days ago
The evidence I see is the article linked in the OP.
If that happened, it’s absent from the article in the OP.
Jhex@lemmy.world 4 days ago
There is clearly NO enforcement in there… maybe we think “enforcement” are different things here
Ulrich@feddit.org 4 days ago
I don’t know how you can not see enforcement. It’s in the headline of the article.
Jhex@lemmy.world 4 days ago
“Judge in Epic v. Apple bans Apple from charging commission on purchases made outside App Store”
That is what the judge ordered, who is forcing Apple to comply? forcing them to follow the ruling is the definition of “enforcement”, not the ruling itself
And the reason I am second guessing is that the court had already ruled against Apple and they just ignored that and doubled down on the bad behaviour