tech, food, anything
Comment on Google is killing privacy sandbox in Chrome.
death@infosec.pub 1 year ago
All for-profit tech eventually yields to enshittification.
Quill7513@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
unless theres meaningful competition
SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.kya.moe 1 year ago
Cartels
untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Those exist but then that’s not competition anymore, its a cartel. If those were abolished it would be better.
demonsword@lemmy.world 1 year ago
unless theres meaningful competition
late stage capitalism is all about giant corporations merging and becoming monopolists
untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
And that lacks competition, so no wonder that it sucks
knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
what’s that?
untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Competition that is meaningful. Like if you produce bottled water, and you lower the quality of it (like, idk maybe theres stuff floating inside) so its cheaper to make, people will notice and switch to an alternative. And when the alternative tries something similar, they’ll switch back to you. Regulation can also help with this but at the same time it increases the barrier to entry for new players, lowering competition. I think.
bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Google is really damned if they do, damned if they don’t here. Third party cookies are very privacy invasive, but replacing it with Chrome watching everything you do and acting as an ad broker is also not great. As long as Google is providing targeted advertising (which you could opt out of in privacy sandbox) then there’s not a really great solution.
I do think they dragged this along enough that all sites now operate properly with third party cookies disabled, so that’s a benefit at least.