They are purely losing money
The only money they make is from boosting their stock aka future potential value
WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 5 days ago
Don’t they charge per token?
So they’re also making money every time somebody says please or thank you…
Evotech@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Infinite@lemmy.zip 5 days ago
It’s by usage via API, but all-you-can-eat via web UI
PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 5 days ago
As far as I know, they lose money on every prompt, even with the $200/mo “Pro” subscription.
blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 5 days ago
Well sure, answering the queries continues to cost the company money regardless of what subscription the user has. The company would definitely make more money if the users paid for subscription and then made zero queries.
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 days ago
I’m not sure how to interpret your counterpoint. Can you clarify? It’s an unprofitable business model unless people pay and don’t use it?
blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 4 days ago
My point was that “lose money on every prompt” would be true in a technical sense regardless of how much people were paying for a subscription. The subscription money is money in, and the cost of calculations is money out. It’s still money out regardless of what is coming in.
As for whether the business is profitable or not, it’s not so easy to tell unless you’re an insider. Companies like this basically never make a ‘profit’ on paper, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t enriching themselves. They are counting their own pay as part of the costs, and they set their pay to whatever they like. They are also counting various research and expansion efforts as part of the cost. So yeah, they might not have any excess money to pay dividends to shareholders, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t profitable.