Comment on Unlike in movies, most smart people aren't good in chess.

• drmoose@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endgame_tablebase#Lomonos…

  The only argument for “chess is not solved” is because of sheer math number but its a flawed argument as any game with sufficient amount of positions would be considered unsolved.

  So for all practical intents and purposes - chess is a solved game but people are too attached to admit it.

  source

  • svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solving_chess

    No, the argument for “chess is not solved” is that unless you can tell me whether or not it is possible for white to force a win, then it is - by definition - not solved.

    source

    • drmoose@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Again “unsolvable” through sheer amount of positions is a cop out because thats boring as fuck. It’s not an interesting game where computational power is the only challenge.

      source

      • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        What is a game that wouldn’t be solvable if you removed most of the pieces and positions?

        source
  • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I mean, yes. Any game with only a small number of possible moves can be solved with brute force trial and error.

    All unsolved games must have a “sufficient amount of positions” that brute force isn’t an option, and enough complexity that there’s not a cute maths trick to solve it despite the number of moves.

    Chess is one of these unsolved games.

    source