Comment on ontologically evil human being
sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 1 day ago Pointing to specific instances of scientific development and religious interference with scientific development does not create an argument. You have to add analysis that places these examples within their respective historical, political, economic, and cultural contexts. Then use that to support a defensible claim.
Regardless, none of your examples address the core of my argument which was, to clarify, that investment in abstract sciences originates from specific economic necessities rooted in the dominant mode of production rather than ideological dispositions. The existing ideological perspectives surrounding scientific development form as political and social justification for the meeting of those material economic needs. Not the other way around.
deHaga@feddit.uk 19 hours ago
It’s just a fact of history. The Islamic golden age was from the 8th to 14th century.
Your criticism of Cromwell uses presentism. Which is pretty stupid. Especially when you consider the fact that these medieval theology nutters are still preaching it now lol
chloroken@lemmy.ml 13 hours ago
Handwaving all of Islam, painting Arabic people as anti scientific, and claiming Brits invented science is some of the most bigoted, ahistorical, chauvinistic horse shit I’ve ever read. You are a bog standard reactionary clown.
The person you’re replying to is smarter than you btw.
deHaga@feddit.uk 11 hours ago
If only you could understand irony.
The post is about religion and societies based on religious purity.
We fucked all our religious nutters off to America.