Comment on Ente wants to take on Google Photos with its privacy-first photo storage service

• Showroom7561@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Has that killed Bitwarden yet? There are many self-hosted projects that also have paid options.

  I’d be happy with a paid (one-time fee) license for a self-hosted option with any software. Subscriptions should only be paying for data/storage, and if that’s offloaded to the customer’s local hardware, there’s no need to keep them on a subscription.

  Especially for a product that’s privacy-first, that really should include a self-hosted option (paid or otherwise).

  source

  • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I didn’t say anything about “killing”.

    source

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      You implied that it would hurt business, and that really doesn’t seem to be the case for other projects using a self-hosted/subscription business model.

      If you meant something else, then I guess I misunderstood. No harm, no foul.

      source

      • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Hurting /= killing

        source

        • -> View More Comments