Comment on Rachel Reeves rules out wealth tax if Labour wins next election

• lasagna@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  History is a cycle. I’d rather not be in the shitty part of it, thanks.

  source

  • JoBo@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    As in 1997, a pineapple could beat the Tories at the next election. Nobody needs you cheerleading the Labour right as if everything will magically be fine if only they’re in power. It won’t. It’ll be a fucking disaster for generations to come. That’s the best of your least worst options and the very least you can do is make it clear that you are not fucking happy about it.

    source

    • midgephoto@photog.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      @JoBo @lasagna curious assertions. And I think neither correct nor clever.

      source

      • lasagna@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Oh, this is what interacting with Mastodon means. I don’t get notifications for the tags.

        And that’s okay, mate. I haven’t tried to look clever. I don’t consider myself clever.

        I’m not used to things like Twitter much. Do people just not provide insight when they post? Your posts reads like “And I think neither correct nor clever. But I’m not going to say why because my head lives in my ass.”

        source
    • lasagna@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      If you’re still claiming that I think the Labour will magically fix anything then I doubt you have understood anything I said. Again, no surprise. I’m not saying any of this to convince you.

      source

      • JoBo@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Stop cheerleading for more competently implemented fascism. FFS

        source

        • -> View More Comments