Actually, the take was really just talking about preventing monopolies, closest thing to anything about related to capitalism.
I just don’t see where you got ‘Capitalism regression’ from, my post or from the comments. In this comment thread, the op, is just saying the usual anti ai stance. It doesn’t (I don’t think) have anything to do with changing anything from capitalism to socialism.
Although having one person almost exclusively using ai, could risk creatig a monopoly for voice actors. But realistically, just don’t leave it to one person, the issue is greedy people trying to nickel and dime as much as possible and spending less and less, not the ai tech itself.
RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
“AI steals jobs from lists jobs.”
If you want to discuss ideal fantasies, then discuss dismantling the need to hitch artistic talent to survival in a post scarcity world. To dismantling the need to be paid for created art. It’s more achievable than stopping capitalism from preying on the utility of low effort profit. Otherwise it’s history repeating every other job replaced by machine advancement. Artists are just big mad at ai because it’s now their turn to face the chomping maws of endless profit. This is what comes for every job the moment a way is found to automate or do it better. If you dont like it, then push for progressive changes. Otherwise it’s just people trying to create a moral issue around AI instead of acknowledging capitalism as the culprit.