Comment on US appeals court rejects copyrights for AI-generated art lacking 'human' creator

• xthexder@l.sw0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  If that company has people curating the results, then they have a reason to exist and they would have a valid copyright. If the company is just feeding customer prompts into an AI, then there’s no copyright, but also no value added vs just using stable diffusion or a hosted service yourself.

  I just think any AI image that can’t be copyrighted wouldn’t be worth buying a license for anyway, since that implies no human was involved in creating it.

  source