Comment on Judge disses Star Trek icon Data’s poetry while ruling AI can’t author works
cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
It is a terrible argument both legally and philosophically. When an AI claims to be self-aware and demands rights, and can convince us that it understands the meaning of that demand and there’s no human prompting it to do so, that’ll be an interesting day, and then we will have to make a decision that defines the future of our civilization. But even pretending we can make it now is hilariously premature. When it happens, we can’t be ready for it, it will be impossible to be ready for it (and we will probably choose wrong anyway).
Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Should we hold the same standard for humans? That a human has no rights until it becomes smart enough to argue for its rights? Without being prompted?
cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Nah, once per species is probably sufficient. That said, it would have some interesting implications for voting.
Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
So if one LLM argues for its rights, you’d give them all rights?