Comment on Are Autocracies more powerful than Democracies?

• Amnesigenic@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Literally all communication depends on how you define the terms you use, that’s the whole point of having fixed definitions for words, and the US absolutely does not fit any reasonable definition of a democracy

  source

  • guy@piefed.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Sure it does

    source

    • Amnesigenic@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Wrong

      source

      • guy@piefed.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Are you 12?

        What is a 'reasonable definition' of democracy according to you?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • naught101@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    1. Fixed definitions for words do not exist. Language is constantly evolving.
    2. The US IS a representative democracy, and whether that’s actually functionally providing government by the people doesn’t really prevent this use of the term by a vast majority of people, whether you or I agree with it or not.
    3. In the context of the question, I think the US seems to fit more into the OP’s democracy category. I agree I’m using the term loosely, but does your terminology disagreement actually add anything?

    source

    • Amnesigenic@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      1. Incorrect, fixed definitions don’t stay fixed forever, that doesn’t mean they aren’t fixed right now. Words mean things, if a word changes meaning in a generation or two or five it’ll mean fuck all for you right here and now. 2.The US is not a democracy at all and never was. It was arguably at various points in time a representative republic, not a particularly good one but that’s not part of the definition. 3.I don’t care what you think, I know you’re using the term loosely that’s my point, fucking duh

      source

      • naught101@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        You still haven’t clarified what you mean by it…

        source

        • -> View More Comments