Comment

Comment on Brave CEO rants about "lefties," "glowies," George Soros

You said it “sounds accurate” then complained about people’s criticism of it. You didn’t actually give any detail about what’s accurate about it or try to explain it in terms that aren’t “rude”.

So my reading comprehension is fine, it’s just your ability to actually explain what it is you agree with (in terms that aren’t “rude”) is lacking.

source

Sort:hotnew top

limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Ok:

list of donors that are not all left

parent organizations that get money from above

mozilla gets money from parents

Op latches onto one donor; pulls some other stuff out , and the crowd goes wild
source
- JcbAzPx@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Okay, but what’s the bad part here? That’s just a very generic overview of how donating works.
  
  source
  - limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    The bad part is four things:
    
    the op either deliberately or legitimately did not understand what was being said
    
    the vast majority of the comments just read what the op wrote and not what was said
    
    having this many comments out of whack with this many upvotes gives ammunition to the bigots
    
    this is a tech forum ??
    
    source
    LWD@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    
    the vast majority of the comments just read what the op wrote and not what was said
    
    What part of my post isn’t something he said
    
    source
- SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  
  This put it in the lefties-only-no-righty-Irish-need-apply revolving-door personnel sector of NGOs
  
  Ok, so you say the donors are not all left, so why would a politically diverse set of donors result in Mozilla having “lefties-only” hiring practices? Reading comprehension requires some critical thinking.
  
  It seems Brendan Eich doesn’t understand that it’s a politcal diverse group that donated to Mozilla (as you do), given the next sentence. Someone with strong reading comprehension would understand logic of, but I’ll explain it to you. His statement is saying that Mozilla became a politically biased organization because of influence from those that donated to it.
  
  Though your strong reading comprehension may have resulted in you having a different interpretation of “lefties-only-no-righty-Irish-need-apply” to mean… well maybe explain what that means to us poor illiterate people that don’t possess your intellectual prowess, LOL.
  
  Also do you care to comment on your interpretation on the “glowies” remark? What does that word mean to you? What is Brendan Eich saying there? Something you agree with I guess.
  
  source