Comment on Brother accused of locking down third-party printer ink cartridges via forced firmware updates, removing older firmware versions from support portals

wowwoweowza@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  If you read the article:

  We are aware of the recent false claims suggesting that a Brother firmware update may have restricted the use of third-party ink cartridges. Please be assured that Brother firmware updates do not block the use of third-party ink in our machines.

  So there’s no reason to leave an inflammatory and likely wrong title unchanged or otherwise without notation. The title is completely readable. I’m all for wrong information being flagged, and a strikethrough is a fine method of doing so.

  source

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    We don’t know if it’s wrong though, we just have a statement from the company claiming it is. Now it’s on the community to prove it.

    It’s potentially wrong. I guess we’ll see in the coming weeks as people try to prove it one way or another.

    source

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      There is no official report of Brother doing what it’s accused of. Only a couple people having issues with a few cartridges, no analysis of whether the flaw was in the third party cartridge or an actual firmware issue, but we should get out the pitchforks and torches and leave a completely unproven statement up? I completely disagree. There’s too much BS passed off as objective truth as it is.

      source

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        One or two reports could be chalked up to noise. Rossmann provided much more than that. I’m not saying he’s right, I’m just saying there’s sufficient evidence that I’m not just going to accept “nope, we don’t do that.”

        We certainly need more evidence, and hopefully Rossmann’s video reaches enough people to get it, one way or another. He has demonstrated admitting when he is wrong, and he has also demonstrated doing the research.

        I doubt this is the last we hear about this, and I sincerely hope Brother is redeemed.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • wowwoweowza@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Totally agree. Just the first time I have seen the notation.

    source
  • bss03@infosec.pub ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I see editability as generally an improvement, especially since the older versions are still visible with a couple of clicks. Reddit titles are not editable. Tweets used to be uneditable; toots are.

    source

    • T156@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      The original rationale for not having editing, at least on Reddit and Twitter, was concerns that someone could get a viral post, and then edit it to spam.

      source
• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  You can edit the title, so if you want to strike through it, go ahead.

  source