Comment on [deleted]
nieminen@lemmy.world 1 day agoRead the article, 2/3 of it corroborate that it is a calorie in/out balance that determines weight, but is simply more complex than a simple formula. Which we all know. Fiber changes how many calories you actually consume. The type of calorie depends on how much you consume (whole foods vs processed, raw vs cooked) Processed sugars like candy is almost entirely taken in calorie wise, but something like an apple or carrot, have to be converted in the digestive system to be absorbed, thereby reducing the effective calorie input (takes energy to convert).
All that said, you do your best to track, (weigh your own food instead of guessing off the label), and keep your calorie intake below what you spend (again, this is generalized, and won’t be 100% accurate, but should get you close and then you adjust as needed). The problem most people face is they make sweeping changes, and quit their eating habits cold turkey. “I’m never eating candy or ice cream again” <- bad idea unless you’re allergic or something. Forbidding it will increase the craving for it, and then when you eventually succumb to the craving, you feel super guilty and basically give up.
I follow the “add good food” rather than the “reduce what I eat”. If you up your fiber and protein intake, it’s SUPER hard to overeat. Fiber and protein are super satiating, and it lasts a long time. Adding whole foods to what you already eat is a great way to reduce overall consumption.
Btw potatoes and beans are GOATed.
amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
ah yes, promoting calorie counting and weighing food, the famously not disordered gymbro eating patterns. the article actually says that calorie counting can cause more harm than good
nieminen@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Lawl, I’m so not a gymbro.
I’m fat, and out of shape, but am slowly working my way to a happier healthier weight, using the principles listed above.
amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 hours ago
you’re what we call in the fat community one of the “good fats”. just know that what you’re promoting is pseudoscience and not conducive to “health” whatever that means
nieminen@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
You’re what we call in the Internet community jackass and a troll.
Look up the definition of pseudoscience, I think you’ll find it fits your discussion points better than mine.
Anywho, troll’s always be trollin’ so I’ll leave off here because you won’t ever even consider you might be wrong. I’ve been on both sides of this argument, and the overwhelming consensus aligns with what I’ve been saying.