Comment on Mexican President Threatens to Sue Google Over 'Gulf of America' Label on Maps.

• Xanza@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  So you are gonna have to provide a source explaining how the president using an executive order to rename international water is “policy” that Google must follow.

  It’s the executive branch. It would be the same as if Congress did the same, and passed a law saying “The Gulf of Mexico is now the Gulf of America.” There’s no source required, it’s literally how the US Government works, but if you want one; American University Law Review (2009) - The Limits of Executive Power:

  The President has broad discretion in choosing how to exercise these implied powers. Second, these implied powers are not plenary in nature. They are subject to three basic limitations: (1) the President may not, without congressional authorization, use these powers to change domestic law or create or alter existing legal obligations; (2) these powers are subject to regulation by Congress; and (3) in the event of a conflict between the exercise of these powers and congressional legislation, the latter prevails.

  There’s no federal law establishing the name of the Gulf of Mexico, so there’s no conflict with the first limitation. No one in Congress is willing to stop him, so no conflict with the second. And there’s no conflict with existing congressional legislation, so there’s no conflict with the third. So therefore the executive order is within the power of the executive branch.

  Because Google is a US company and operates within the US, it has to follow US policy. The President just changed US policy to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico… So they either have to comply or be sued by the executive for not following US policy–which they’ll lose.

  They you’ll have to explain why I, as a Canadian, have to see this stupid renaming in parentheses.

  Because again, Google is a US company. So if you want to see Gulf of Mexico again, use any map provider that isn’t from a US company.

  If the US truely doesn’t have a system beyond “once the president orders it, it’s renamed.”

  That’s an extreme oversimplification of what’s going on here. But it kinda outlines how important it is to elect good people, huh?

  source
• InterrobangBang@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  So you are gonna have to provide a source explaining how the president using an executive order to rename international water is “policy” that Google must follow.

  Exactly

  source

  • Xanza@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Here you go;

    American University Law Review (2009) - The Limits of Executive Power:

    The President has broad discretion in choosing how to exercise these implied powers. Second, these implied powers are not plenary in nature. They are subject to three basic limitations: (1) the President may not, without congressional authorization, use these powers to change domestic law or create or alter existing legal obligations; (2) these powers are subject to regulation by Congress; and (3) in the event of a conflict between the exercise of these powers and congressional legislation, the latter prevails.

    There’s no conflict and therefore within the power of the executive branch.

    source