Comment on Most of Lemmy right now

• FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Oh yeah, the party of fiscal responsability who is now trying to pass a progressive 4,5 billions tax cut for the wealthiest part of society. Who knows when these missing funds for the government will show up in its administrative books???

  You must be so wise in the way of the finances, please (not) teach us master

  source

  • jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    You should probably go back and check your facts. I don’t see anything about a proposed 4.5 billion progressive tax cut.

    source

    • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Sorry, you’re right, it was a 4,5 trillions cut.

      Fiscal responsibility!!

      source

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        You also missed that the bill was extending tax cuts, and finally the cuts being progressive, though I suspect you don’t know what progressive tax cuts are.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Bronzebeard@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Try Looking at an actual graph that does more than an entire term distilled into one number… Some of those don’t even look accurate. You might learn something

  source

  • jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    The numbers must be wrong since they go against your preconceived notions.

    source

    • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      There’s those reading comprehension skills again.

      source

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        You claimed the numbers I provided don’t look accurate and more granular numbers will prove your point but don’t provide any. Seems like you’re saying the numbers must be wrong but can’t provide any data to back that claim. That almost sounds like you have no data and are going off your preconceived notions.

        source