Comment

Fizz@lemmy.nz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

Not really. The above person said I hate lone developers building their own apps. No, I just dont care unless its on a platform that aligns with my ideals.

I dont see any valve in apps built that help transition people into another corporate social media ecosystem. In 5 years bluesky will make the same userhostile choices of facebook, reddit, instagram, twitter.

source

Sort:hotnew top

onlinepersona@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Given how things are going, I bet you’re right. Maybe Musk will create a Bluesky instance (or whatever that federalized yet centralized thing is called).

@RemindMe@mstdn.social in 5 years to check on the state of bluesky

Anti Commercial-AI license

source
Stamets@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Lemmy is based off of reddit, so fuck Lemmy right?

Japans constitution is based off of the US one, so fuck Japan right?

Japans constitution is based off of the US Constitution, so fuck Japan right?

The Space Program is built off of rockets that were used to kill people, so fuck the Saturn V, right?

I’m guessing no to all of those because you’ve got little arguments built up for each one, but here’s the problem. You have to make arguments for each one because your entire stance is nonsense. It’s just “I before E comes after C.” Is it accurate for some things? Yes. Is it accurate for the majority? Absolutely not.

So, yes really. It is a truly insane way to live that is reductive, immature and just openly ignorant about how the world works.

source
- Fizz@lemmy.nz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  This comment is extremely stupid and doesn’t even warrent a reply.
  
  source
- watty@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  The person you are replying to is talking about pink sky being built on bluesky, and you equate that to Lemmy being based on Reddit. One is a hard technical dependency, and the other is a conceptual inspiration.
  
  You are engaging in an equivocation fallacy, and it’s super dishonest.
  
  source
  - Stamets@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    No. I’m using them interchangably here because they are interchangable here. It is as simple as that. If you want to invent a more convoluted train of thought that you want to ascribe to me (because you, of course, know what happens in my head better than I do), by all means, but it won’t change what I meant. Nor will it get me to engage. You already spent every ounce of good will by inventing your own narrative. I’m not going to be a part of it.
    
    source